aaron crews online

my place to share anything I like. 

The story of USDA, BIOTIC, EDAS, and Smartfield

This is a story that I've been wanting to tell.  It's really something that's been nagging me for years.  Finally I have the motivation to go ahead and put it out here.  Is it something to be concerned about? to take advantage of? to just be proud of? for which I should claim prior art? Or is it just sour grapes on my part? You tell me.  One thing I know is that it's one of the more interesting things that has happened in my life so far.

About a month ago, an article popped up in my Google alerts. Lubbock agritech company Smartfield tries for crop-monitoring system

It tells the story behind an exciting company in Lubbock, TX called Smartfield, whose Smartcrop product uses data from your crops to control your irrigation system/schedule, and hopefully conserve water.

Smartcrop uses data consisting of plant canopy temperatures (using infrared thermocouples) along with other environmental data (rain, humidity) to measure the stress of crops.  If a time-temperature threshold is reached, research indicates that the plant is unable to adequately respire and should be watered.  The science behind it was developed and patented (attached) by Dr. James Mahan, Dr. Donald Wanjura, Dr. John Burke, and Dr. Dan Upchurch at the USDA-ARS Crop Science Research Lab in Lubbock.

According to the article, Smartfield was founded when one day after church, Dr. Upchurch (no pun intended) proposed an idea about his research to Tommy Martin, an engineer at Accent Engineering who took Upchurch up on his idea.

"He asked what we were doing, and we'd just finished some work with wireless," said Martin, Smartfield's chief executive officer. "He perked up and said, 'We could use your help.' " 
Within the week, Martin and McNeill were meeting with USDA researcher James Mahan, who was part of a team studying ways to measure heat stress in plants using infrared sensors. 
"We saw a tangle of wires," Martin said. "It was a prototype, and they wanted our help to make it wireless."
It didn't take long before Martin and McNeill saw the potential and pointed out that for commercial use, such a sensing system wouldn't need expensive, research-grade hardware.
"Our background is consumer electronics," said Martin, who first got together with McNeill in 1983 at Texas Industries' Lubbock facility. "We suggested a clean sheet design, that resulted in a product with a more attractive price that could be commercialized."

I remember this time very well.  It was the summer of 2001.  I was a senior in college working for Dr. Mahan at USDA during the summer.  Thomas Mullen, another engineering student who I knew from high school had been working for the previous several summers, and I had joined him as a technician on the BIOTIC research.

Dr. Mahan and Dr. Upchurch approached the guys at Accent to create a wireless thermocouple solution.  It wasn't about commercialization at all - it was a solution to let them put thermocouples farther away from the BIOTIC base unit to give them more flexibility in their research.  It's true though that at that time, the BIOTIC unit was unwieldy (it probably weighed 75+ pounds) and very expensive.  I attached a picture to this post of how it looked back then.

Thomas and I were responsible for most of the technological development behind the unit and its website, where daily crop data was automatically analyzed and posted.  We had to troubleshoot it when the data didn't download right, we had to program the various components that comprised the device, and we had to deploy it to various test sites.

With our intimate knowledge of the technology and its issues, Thomas and I came up with the concept of the clean sheet design.  We talked through all the details, and decided that this would be a great business opportunity.  With that, we established a partnership that we called  EDAS, or Environmental Data Acquisition Systems.  We both invested our summer money into ordering microcontrollers, integrated circuits, buttons, screens, wire, etc, and started up what amounted to a "garage" business.  Thomas worked through the electrical design, I programmed the microcontroller, and together we developed a prototype device.  It only had 1 thermocouple input, but that was good enough for proof of concept - and the thing fit in your hand, a startling contrast to the monstrosity that we were lugging around during business hours.  I've included some pictures of Thomas and I making our prototype with this post.

Read the article excerpt above a little closer.  It didn't take long before Martin and McNeill saw the potential.  Well, can you guess what happened between Accent's wireless work and when they "saw the potential?"  The proposal, memo, and presentation details are included here.  Thomas and I presented our prototype and opened the eyes of the researchers.  We proposed a plan where USDA would fund product development (analogous to their agreement with Accent), we would meet certain device deliverables, and in return we would field test our device in the USDA trials.  When the device design was finalized, we would commercially release the product.

The response from USDA was extremely enthusiastic, and Thomas and I started making plans about how to proceed.  Pretty soon, though, things started to stall out, with sidesteps and ambiguous answers from USDA.  Finally, they said no.  The reasoning was never clear - there was some mention of a conflict of interest regarding the funding of BIOTIC's commercialization.  Of course we know now what happened - our ideas were shared with the Accent guys and we were put off until they came to an agreement with Martin and crew.

It's really too bad, because I think Thomas and I could have done some great things with the idea.  

So what's happened since then? Thomas and I are both now involved in the engineering of huge industrial automation projects.  Martin and McNeill spun off Accent to form Smartfield (website), which is apparently about to grow significantly.  They've received incentive money from the city of Lubbock to stay there, and are planning on hiring 12 employees (about $650k in salary).  Did the researchers make the right decision?  Certainly I question their ethics, but I don't know what would have been best.  At least I've learned my lesson.  


The BIOTIC Patent

(download)


An early prototype of our device; Dr. Mahan with the USDA's BIOTIC unit.

   
Click here to download:
0The_story_of_USDA_BIOTIC_EDAS_.zip (410 KB)


Thomas and I working on our device; Me with our finished prototype.

   
Click here to download:
The_story_of_USDA_BIOTIC_EDAS_.zip (630 KB)


Our proposal presentation

(download)


Proposal summary

(download)


Proposal memo

(download)

Comments [0]

Some Thoughts on Personal Decisions

There are certain areas of life and decisions that are deeply personal.  Some common ones are:
  • Parenting/The way you discipline your kids
  • Religious affiliation and amount of religious practice
  • Politics
  • Personal finance
  • Sexual orientation
Because these areas are so important to us and create so much value in our lives, we feel the need to evangelize and to convince others to align with our way of thinking about the subject and to make the rewarding choices that we've made.

The problem is that these decisions are not made based on direct input from others.  Actually, direct input from others usually has the opposite of its intended effect.  When someone says "my way is right because of X" (with good intentions), the implicit, unintended message is that "your way is wrong because of X."  That causes extremely hurt feelings because of the very nature of these deeply personal issues.  (This is why some people get very offended by the Jehovah's Witnesses, for instance; or why people bomb abortion clinics).

The choices we make in these areas are instead built by a lifetime (however long we've had to this point) of personal experience.  That's what causes these bad reactions when they get these messages. The person feels that they're being told that everything they've lived to this point is wrong.

Because these are based almost solely on personal experience, the only real way to get people to change is through positive life experiences.  That is tough, however, because many times our firmly held beliefs prevent us from trying these experiences in the first place.  

One way around this, though, is to be positive ambassadors (not evangelists) for our ways of thinking.  If people want to follow our example or admire our attributes, they may come around to trying and eventually buying into our way of thought.  The unintended consequences of continued evangelizing on both sides undermines this and, because of that, should not be done.

No one is right or wrong on these issues.  Everyone is right for themselves, based on their experience.  Hopefully through example we can all demonstrate which choices may be most rewarding.  Be cognizant of these unintended consequences when you send those political or religious emails, even though you found value in it, or when you bring up topics like these in conversation.  All the conversation in the world is not going to change someone's life experience.

Comments [1]

Invitation to view a photo from mbnordyke's Picasa Web Album - Quilotoa & Banos

You are invited to view a photo from mbnordyke's photo album: Quilotoa & Banos
View Photo
To share your photos or receive notification when your friends share photos, get your own free Picasa Web Albums account.

Comments [0]

Automation Technology | Web 2.0 Tools Conduct in Concert | Control Global

New media is beginning to make its way into engineering work processes.

In fact, some users of Emerson's DeltaV process control systems already are accessing LinkedIn and Facebook groups on its main Easy DeltaV web page and following strings of questions and answers. "Open-source software developers and PC makers like Dell have been using these forums for years, and we can do it, too," says Jim Cahill, marketing manager for Emerson's Systems and Solutions division and chief blogger for its Process Experts blog. "People need fast answers, and these social areas can really solve some problems. The engineers in our industries are natural problem solvers, so they're gravitating to these new-media technologies because they can be a good shortcut to useful answers and solutions they might not find with traditional methods."

Comments [0]

Twitter and the cloud

A few months ago Gary Mintchell pointed me to this post from Dave Winer, where he proposes some changes to twitter.  Essentially, he says there's value in twitter as a protocol, but that it should be distributed and made available for people to use on their own individual websites.  Twitter conversations could spring up on individual sites around certain topics or posts.  That allows the individual sites to harbor community and to hold the attention of their readers.

I've seen a lot of new technology lately that's also designed to do just that - to bring the conversation around the web back to the originating sites.   Friendfeed provides rooms and widgets to bring it back somewhat, Disqus has a "Reactions" section where the web is scanned for conversation surrounding the post, and most recently JS-Kit introduced Echo, which is designed to aggregate discussion of content in real time on the originating site.  Of course this all is pretty slow or difficult to set up - by its nature you have to use search and/or have to poll a variety of sites/feeds.  Combining group activity on twitter has been limited to the use of hashtags, which take up characters, require a consensus, and take effort/memory to use.

Dave later highlighted Automattic's P2 as a start on a distributed "twitter" publishing tool.  As a matter of fact, after seeing his tweet on the subject I was inspired to create a local P2 instance for our company to use inside our firewall.  There are some architectural issues with that, though.  How do you group related posts for small teams?  If you create seperate P2 instances for each team, how do you share knowledge between them?  So far the only solution I could see was some kind of inside-the-firewall rss aggregator.  As a test solution, I put in an instance of tt-rss, which was ok, but not really multiuser.  Plus, you have other issues like multiple logins, maintenance headaches, different interfaces, etc.

The issue I was seeing with twitter as a protocol is that it was essentially just a handicapped (140 character) version of multiuser blogging or group chat (or commenting even).  What about it would make it "twitter?"  I suggested that all these distributed instances would push content to a twitter cloud, which could be used for trends/aggregation/live search.

Little did I know, Mr. Winer was baiting me and had something up his sleeve.  Today I saw him link to a new project, http://rsscloud.org, which essentially combines these three ideas: (1) a twitter (140-character format) publishing tool which pushes content to (2) a cloud which can be polled by (3) aggregators.  A source tag ties everything back to its original content, so aggregation is easy.

It's something that apparently existed all the way back in 2001, but only amongst Radio UserLand.  If twitter catches on as a protocol, I think this is a truly powerful concept.  I wonder how it all fits in with the activity stream standard and FriendFeed's SUP proposal and all the other needs out there.

Comments [1]

The Case for Working With Your Hands - NYTimes.com

the pitcher longs for water to carry/and a person for work that is real.

Comments [0]

My brother joined his girlfriend yesterday in Ecuador for a month-long adventure.

One of those things that a lot of people always say they're going to do but never do.  Congrats to them for having the guts to just do it.  You can follow their adventures on Manda's blog, leave no stone unturned.

Comments [0]

I thought I would test this out.

Had a fun 4th of July, even though there was a lot of packing and driving back from Austin.  We brought in some pizza and made s'mores on the grill and Owen and Mason got to try sparklers for the first time.

Comments [0]

Summer fun

Comments [0]

originally posted 11/13/03

Well, a few things have changed since Feb when I started this thing.  First of all, I haven’t been writing in it as I originally intended.  Anyway, I’ve also gone through the great excitement of getting engaged to Erin.  We’ve got a website set up at erinandaaron.com, so that can be checked out.  The date is january 24 2004. 

As for everything else… it’s pretty much the same as always.  I’m still in oklahoma, trying to make the best out of a stupid situation.  Erin’s up here still, but now has a job, although it doesn’t require her degree.  I feel like things will improve soon, but I guess there’s no way to know.

You know, it’s amazing… hardly anyone I know is actually doing what they thought/hoped they’d be doing after college.  I think that’s one of the biggest misconceptions/lies about how to achieve your goals—you feel like if you can make it through college—the tests, studying, expense, etc—it’ll all be worth it because in the end you’ll have a job you love and you’ll be rich and everything will be good for you.  Well, I guess like everything else a college education is no guarantee.  I’m one of the lucky ones out there.  Of course now everyone (myself included) is kind of at square one, trying to decide how in the heck we’re going to do the things we dreamed of doing when we were kids.  When we were in school, we at least had a direction (get through school!).  Now there’s too many directions and everyone either doesn’t know which to choose, is too afraid to choose, or chose and is just crossing their fingers and hoping it somehow all works out in the end.  It’d better work out in the end.

Comments [0]